Timely Insights and Updates at the Intersection of Financial Services, Fintech, and Consumer Protection
On November 5, 2025, a national debt collection trade group and one of its members filed a lawsuit against the state of Colorado’s in an attempt to block its 2023 medical debt credit reporting law, HB 23-1126. The complaint alleges that the law, which bars adverse medical debt information from consumer credit reports and restricts related collection communications, is preempted by the Fair Credit Reporting Act and violates the First Amendment.
In making its claims, the complaint argues that the law conflicts with the CFPB’s recent interpretation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act where the agency asserted that FCRA pre-empts state attempts to restrict the reporting of medical debt (previously discussed here), and claims that the law has created economic and operational challenges for multiple types of market participants. Plaintiffs also assert that the Colorado law is a content, purpose, and listener-based restriction on truthful commercial speech, because it bars negative medical tradelines in most credit contexts while allowing positive information and certain mortgage-related reporting.
Putting It Into Practice: As we predicted, the CFPB’s recent re-interpretation of FCRA has opened the floodgates of litigation. The lawsuit highlights the increasing tension between state efforts to remove medical debt from credit reports (previously discussed here, here, and here) and a renewed emphasis on national credit reporting standards. Given the plaintiffs’ reliance on recent federal developments, similar challenges to other state medical debt reporting laws are likely to follow, particularly in states that have enacted broad suppression requirements.
A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.
Mehul Madia, special counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, provides deep consumer finance and fintech expertise to clients, leveraging more than 15 years’ of public and private sector experience.
Max is an associate in the Finance & Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Orange County office.
This alert is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice and is not intended to form an attorney client relationship. Please contact your Sheppard Mullin attorney contact for additional information.
Our Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog covers the issues of the day, including new regulations, regulatory and enforcement trends, important cases, and events on Capitol Hill for one of the nation’s most heavily regulated industries.
Sheppard Mullin is a full-service Global 100 firm with more than 1,200 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, industry-leading companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high-stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the U.S., the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100. For more information, please visit www.sheppardmullin.com.
By scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie and Advertising Policy. If you do not wish to accept cookies from our website, or would like to stop cookies being stored on your device in the future, you can find out more and adjust your preferences here.
Agree
Colorado’s Medical Debt Reporting Law Challenged in Federal Court – Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
