Social Media
Religious intellectualism in the Islamic world began with a grand promise: to reconcile faith with reason, ethics with religion, and freedom with tradition. This project sought to demonstrate that religion is not an obstacle to modernity, but can instead serve as a force for ethics, justice, and human emancipation. Yet after several decades, a serious question has emerged: has religious intellectualism truly fulfilled this promise, or has it reached a theoretical and practical impasse?
Mohammad Reza Nikfar, an Iranian leftist thinker and activist and one of the most prominent critics of this current, argues in his writings and lectures, particularly in his discussion of “Religious Intellectualism: Its Beginning and Its End,” that the core problem of religious intellectualism lies not in its intentions but in its intellectual structure. In his view, religious intellectualism has often failed to properly conceptualize the relationship between faith, ethics, and freedom. Precisely for this reason, in many cases, instead of opening horizons of freedom, it has resulted in a form of soft religious conservatism.
The central question in Nikfar’s critique is this: Is ethics in religious intellectualism independent of faith, or subordinate to it? In practice, the answer offered by many religious intellectuals has been that ethics finds meaning only in the light of faith. This answer, although it may appear moderate and conciliatory on the surface, carries a decisive consequence: ethics is no longer a criterion for critiquing religion; rather, it itself becomes in need of religious justification. As a result, whenever a conflict arises between modern ethical values, such as individual freedom, gender equality, or human rights, and a dominant religious interpretation, it is ethics that is forced to retreat.
For this reason, Nikfar emphasizes that religious intellectualism often seeks, instead of holding faith accountable before ethics and freedom, to confine ethics and freedom within the framework of faith. At this point, the project of religious intellectualism gradually shifts from a critical current into a form of rationalized defense of religious tradition.
When this critique is placed alongside the modern philosophical tradition, its depth becomes clearer. In Kantian moral philosophy, ethics is autonomous; moral values arise from human reason, not from revelation or tradition. Similarly, in Jürgen Habermas’s theory of the public sphere, religion can play a role in public life only insofar as it translates its concepts into the language of public reason, rather than imposing religious criteria on everyone. Religious intellectualism, however, often comes to a halt midway along this path: it neither fully accepts the independence of ethics nor fundamentally moves beyond the authority of religious tradition.
In a society like Afghanistan, this issue is no longer merely a theoretical debate; it has become a lived crisis. Afghanistan is a society in which religion, politics, power, and historical violence are deeply intertwined. In such a context, religious intellectualism could have played an emancipatory role: critiquing religious power, defending human freedom unconditionally, and redefining ethics as a standard that transcends tradition and expediency. In practice, however, what has been more commonly observed is a form of chronic intellectual caution. Many religious intellectuals in Afghanistan have either avoided explicit criticism of religious power structures or have postponed freedom in the name of “the society’s special conditions,” “maintaining order,” or “religious expediency.” The consequence of this approach has been that ethics and freedom are treated not as foundational principles, but as conditional and suspendable matters.
In such circumstances, religious intellectualism inadvertently contributes to the reproduction of the status quo. For when ethics is not independent, and freedom is always defined within the framework of faith, religious power, regardless of its form or interpretation, remains immune from fundamental critique. This is precisely the point Nikfar refers to as the “end of the project of religious intellectualism”: an end not marked by sudden failure, but by the gradual erosion of its critical force.
Today, Afghanistan needs above all an ethics independent of power and a freedom independent of religious interpretation. If religious intellectualism cannot accept and defend this independence, it will not only fail to offer solutions but will itself become part of the problem. In this sense, Nikfar’s critique is a serious warning: without a clear separation between faith, ethics, and freedom, no intellectual project, even one that calls itself intellectualism, can lead to human emancipation.
You can read the Persian version of this analysis here:
اخلاق و آزادی در روشنفکری دینی
Join Lynne O’Donnell for 8AM’s podcast series, Insights.
Lynne talks with generals, diplomats, soldiers, journalists, politicians, activists, people who have front row seats for conflicts around the world, and citizens with a story to tell, happy or sad. For this first series, Afghanistan is the focus. Lynne and her guests talk about the collapse of the republic in August, 2021, and the impact since — for the people of Afghanistan, for the security of the region, for the safety of the world. It’s important, interesting and insightful.
Controlling the Narrative
Lynne O’Donnell talks with Mina Sharif, author, activist, women’s rights campaigner, educator and mentor. They discuss who controls the narrative and who speaks for Afghanistan’s people when the Taliban appear to have seized control not only of the country but of the message, too.
Have a listen
8AM Media, also known as Hasht-e-Subh Daily, stands as Afghanistan’s premier independent and non-profit newspaper, resonating as a beacon of journalistic integrity since its establishment in June 2007 by esteemed Afghan journalists and human rights advocates. With a steadfast commitment to citizen journalism and civic education, Hasht-e-Subh Daily has earned its place as the most esteemed publication in the nation.
Publisher: Sanjar Sohail
Email: [email protected]
Executive Director: Parwiz Kawa
Email: [email protected]
© 2023 – ©Hasht-e Subh Daily
© 2023 – ©Hasht-e Subh Daily
